Side-by-side comparison

Awwwards vs CSSWinner vs CSS Design Awards vs The Webby Awards

Criteria, pricing, judging, verdict.

Side-by-side comparison of Awwwards, CSSWinner, CSS Design Awards, and The Webby Awards: how each program scores, what it costs, and who it's for.

The facts, side by side.

AttributeAwwwardsCSSWinnerCSS Design AwardsThe Webby Awards
Founded2009201020091996
HeadquartersValencia, Spain--New York, USA
Submission fee$65$15$50Varies by category and deadline
Acceptance rate----
Monthly traffic----
Judging systemEach entry is scored by a minimum of 18 jurors on Design (40%), Usability (30%), Creativity (20%), and Content (10%); the weighted average produces SOTD, SOTM, and SOTY winners. An approved site stays eligible for Site of the Day for three months.A review panel supplies 80% of the ranking and a public vote the remaining 20%; sites scoring 75% or higher qualify for Site of the Day, which feeds Site of the Month.Jury panel scores each entry across UI, UX, and Innovation. An average above 8.00 earns Website of the Day; above 6.0 earns a Special Kudos certificate. Public awards additionally require 20+ votes alongside a 6.0 judge average.Judged by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences (IADAS); each category awards a jury-selected Webby and a public-vote People’s Voice winner.
Award levels
  • Honorable Mention
  • Site of the Day
  • Site of the Month
  • Site of the Year
  • Nominee
  • Star
  • Winner
  • Site of the Day
  • Site of the Month
  • Special Kudos
  • Website of the Day
  • Website of the Month
  • Website of the Year
  • Designer of the Year
  • Nominee
  • Honoree
  • People’s Voice Winner
  • Webby Winner
Categories
  • Site of the Day
  • Mobile Excellence
  • Developer
  • E-Commerce
  • UI/UX
  • Creative
  • E-Commerce
  • Corporate
  • UI
  • UX
  • Innovation
  • E-Commerce
  • Mobile
  • Websites
  • Apps & Software
  • Video
  • Podcasts
  • Social
  • AI & Innovation
Judging criteria
  • Design (40%)
  • Usability (30%)
  • Creativity (20%)
  • Content (10%)
  • Design
  • Usability
  • Content
  • Functionality
  • UI design
  • UX design
  • Innovation
  • Content
  • Structure & navigation
  • Visual design
  • Functionality
  • Interactivity
  • Overall experience
Best for
  • Visual-first portfolio agencies
  • Motion-heavy work
  • Brand storytelling sites
  • UI/UX craft
  • Creative studio portfolios
  • Teams that want a quick design badge
  • UI craft
  • UX-led product sites
  • Big brand and agency campaigns
  • Broad digital work beyond web design
  • Teams seeking mainstream prestige
Official sitewww.awwwards.comwww.csswinner.comwww.cssdesignawards.comwww.webbyawards.com

How each one reads.

  • The largest web design awards community, best known for Site of the Day, Site of the Month, and Site of the Year recognition voted by a global jury.
  • A long-running web design awards gallery recognizing standout UI/UX and creative websites, with Site of the Day, Star, and Winner honors decided by a review panel plus a public vote.
  • Web design awards focused on UI design, UX, and innovation, with daily Website of the Day picks and curated specials.
  • The leading international awards for excellence on the internet - presented by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences across websites, apps, video, podcasts, and social.

FAQ

  • What's the difference between Awwwards vs CSSWinner vs CSS Design Awards vs The Webby Awards?

    Awwwards: The largest web design awards community, best known for Site of the Day, Site of the Month, and Site of the Year recognition voted by a global jury. CSSWinner: A long-running web design awards gallery recognizing standout UI/UX and creative websites, with Site of the Day, Star, and Winner honors decided by a review panel plus a public vote. CSS Design Awards: Web design awards focused on UI design, UX, and innovation, with daily Website of the Day picks and curated specials. The Webby Awards: The leading international awards for excellence on the internet - presented by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences across websites, apps, video, podcasts, and social.

  • How is each program judged?

    Awwwards: Each entry is scored by a minimum of 18 jurors on Design (40%), Usability (30%), Creativity (20%), and Content (10%); the weighted average produces SOTD, SOTM, and SOTY winners. An approved site stays eligible for Site of the Day for three months. CSSWinner: A review panel supplies 80% of the ranking and a public vote the remaining 20%; sites scoring 75% or higher qualify for Site of the Day, which feeds Site of the Month. CSS Design Awards: Jury panel scores each entry across UI, UX, and Innovation. An average above 8.00 earns Website of the Day; above 6.0 earns a Special Kudos certificate. Public awards additionally require 20+ votes alongside a 6.0 judge average. The Webby Awards: Judged by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences (IADAS); each category awards a jury-selected Webby and a public-vote People’s Voice winner.

  • Who is each award best for?

    Awwwards - Visual-first portfolio agencies, Motion-heavy work, Brand storytelling sites. CSSWinner - UI/UX craft, Creative studio portfolios, Teams that want a quick design badge. CSS Design Awards - UI craft, UX-led product sites. The Webby Awards - Big brand and agency campaigns, Broad digital work beyond web design, Teams seeking mainstream prestige.

Go deeper.

Sources for non-Web Design Awards facts: each program's official site. Last reviewed: Awwwards (2026-08-24), CSSWinner (2026-08-24), CSS Design Awards (2026-08-24), The Webby Awards (2026-07-04).

- Free to enter

Get your work on a DA 58 domain buyers actually browse.

Nominate your website now and every published nominee earns a permanent, indexed page on our Domain Authority 58 domain - plus a shot at an award, a badge, and a listing buyers browse when they're choosing who to hire.

Nominate your website See what's included →