Come build the place where good work gets found.

You design the pages that a site about design gets judged on. Wireframes through high-fidelity mockups, the layout and type systems underneath, and work that holds up to close scrutiny - because here, it will get some.

Both sides of the product: designers submitting and tracking work, and the buyers browsing the index to find them. The flows, the system underneath, and the craft to make the two hold together.

The badges, certificates and award pages are what winners put on their own sites. They get looked at closely, by people who design for a living.

Badges, certificates, award page elements and short-form video. Motion for a brand whose entire business is noticing when something is well made.

Hands-on and senior in the load-bearing sense. You own areas of the codebase and make the architectural calls that come with that - across the curated index, the judging tools, and the hiring and agency marketplace.

Schema through interface, across the submission flow, the judging tools and the public directory. Features you own rather than tickets you pick up.

The public surface of a site about design, which is a harder brief than it sounds. Fast, accessible, indexable - and good enough to survive its own rubric.

A submission flow, a judging pipeline and a public index that all have to work on the day a deadline lands. You are the reason they do.

The traffic, the submission funnel and the directory all generate numbers nobody else has time to read properly. You do - and you turn them into something the team can act on.

Two sides of a marketplace, each with its own reasons to leave. You find where they drop, and make the case for what to change about it.

The judging pipeline is the product. You run it - entries in, jurors assigned, scores checked for consistency, and results out on time and defensible.

Everything published here carries a score behind it. You own the standard copy meets before it goes out, and the calendar that keeps it going out.

Award pages, features and winner announcements. Copy that has to be accurate about scores and attributions first and good second - though it does need to be both.

Winner announcements, rankings, and the weekly piece explaining why a site scored the way it did. The rubric is public, so the writing has to match it.

Writing built to rank without reading like it was. Articles, landing pages, and the category pages that carry most of the search traffic.

The rubric, the scoring and the submission rules are only fair if they can be read. You write the documentation that makes a judged process legible to designers, studios and hiring teams.

Raw footage into something publishable, on a weekly and monthly schedule. Cuts that hold up in front of an audience who notice craft for a living.

Marketing for a platform whose actual product is credibility. Campaigns that bring in submissions and traffic without ever overstating what the award is.

Demand on both sides of a marketplace: designers and studios submitting work to be judged, and the hiring teams arriving to find them. Channels you own, tested and scaled on the numbers.

A large, growing index of award and nominee pages that only matters if it can be found. Technical and on-page SEO across all of it.

The recurring newsletter is how most people follow the judging. You write it, send it, and own every number that comes back off it.

The winning work is the content. The job is putting it in front of people in a way that does the design justice and still performs.

The designers, studios and agencies around the awards are the audience and the supply at once. You keep that community talking - and keep the tone right while it does.

First contact with the agencies and studios we want in the index. Outbound that has been researched rather than blasted, inbound that gets qualified properly, and meetings that are worth the calendar slot.

Closing sponsored visibility across the index, the directory and the editorial placements. Full cycle, from first outreach to a signed renewal.

The agencies, studios and sponsors on the other side of the table. Pitched, closed, and then actually looked after through the renewal - which is the part most people skip.

Submissions in, jurors scheduled, results published, index accurate. The work that makes a judged programme run on time - and that shows immediately when it does not.

Leadership support on a small distributed team, which means the calendar, the correspondence and the follow-up all route through you - and nothing quietly drops.

Submissions, judging timelines, badges, billing. You are the person who answers - and the answer has to be right, because people are paying to be judged against a deadline.

Full-cycle hiring on a small team that is growing, which means building the process at the same time as you are running it.

The money side of a platform with several revenue lines - free, premium and rushed submissions, memberships, sponsorships. Clean books, reconciled on a schedule, no surprises at year end.